NY Times Article Explores Cenegenics as the New Weapon Against Aging

The New York Times featured Cenegenics in an article by journalist Tom Dunkel called “Vigor Quest.” Dunkel followed a 51-year-old Cenegenics patient, and explores hotly debated topics such as hormone optimization and male menopause. The article focuses on the difference between age management medicine’s proactive approach to middle-age malaise and mainstream medicine’s.

According to Michale J. “Mickey” Barber, MD, the CEO/CMO of Cenegenics Carolinas, our 2010 hormonal chemistry has been dictated by a millennium of evolution and is now outdated for today’s demands.

“Medical advances have us living until 70 or even 90, rather than the old 40-year benchmark. With that, we’re expected to perform at a 20-years’ younger level with this outdated endocrine chemistry. The medical profession is missing a key factor . . . why do we think our hormones should be suboptimal as we age? Years ago, the medical profession thought 70 year olds should tolerate a higher blood
pressure and higher LDL level than their 30-something counterparts. Now, of course, we treat those older persons to have blood pressure and LDL levels equivalent to the 30 year old,” Barber said.

“Vigor Quest” explores both sides of this often controversial field of medicine, and raises compelling arguments for age management medicine naysayers.

Read the Full Article: Vigor Quest

Read the Press Release: NY Times Investigates Baby Boomer Vigor Quest & Cenegenics.

For more information or to schedule a comprehensive health evaluation, please call (843) 577-8484.

Tags: , ,

Comments are closed.

NY Times Article Explores Cenegenics as the New Weapon Against Aging

The New York Times featured Cenegenics in an article by journalist Tom Dunkel called “Vigor Quest.” Dunkel followed a 51-year-old Cenegenics patient, and explores hotly debated topics such as hormone optimization and male menopause. The article focuses on the difference between age management medicine’s proactive approach to middle-age malaise and mainstream medicine’s.

Read more

*Video:

Many of us, particularly the hard driving Type A individuals, claim they need only 6 hours of sleep to be productive. Unfortunately, most are likely fooling themselves. A recent study at the University of California-San Francisco published in Science has identified a genetic mutation that causes individuals to need only 6 hours of sleep nightly. This gene runs in families and only occurs in 3% of individuals.

For the rest of us, 7-8 ½ hours are required for both health and productivity. Most of us are building a large and dangerous sleep debt. Individuals with chronic sleep deprivation are likely to have increased motor vehicle accidents as well as short term memory, focus and attention issues. Depression and inability to control appetite are also associated with inadequate sleep. Lastly, obesity and increased vascular inflammation have been linked to poor sleep quantity and quality. Obviously, adequate sleep is a huge preventive medicine issue.

The good news? Researchers are working on a compound that could mimic the gene mutation. Until then, listen to your mother and get 8 hours of sleep.